<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S-1116: 12V Briefcase Solar Generator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLIAM MCLEAN</title>
		<link>http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLIAM MCLEAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/#comment-784</guid>
		<description>I own four of these.  Got them from another source.  I have all of them in a closet waiting for an extended power outage.  I purchased Radio Shack #274-1573 adapters so that I can plug them directly into my four Xantrex XPower Powerpack 400 plus units (battery pack power sources).  These power packs give me both 12 Volt DC and 115 Volt AC.  I keep them fully charged by plugging them in to the wall socket.  As for choosing solar panels, If I could afford it (and I was many years younger) I might have purchased the much more expensive monocrystalline solar panels.  They retain 80% of original efficiency after twenty five years of continuous use.  By contrast, these much cheaper S-1116 briefcase panels will only last about five years of continuous use.  Also, the monocrystalline panels are much more efficient and thus smaller while producing higher wattage.  A nice portable monocrystalline briefcase is available at much higher cost.  It is even somewhat weather proof.  The S-1116 is not weather proof.  If you want to set up a lifetime solar power source, buy monocrystalline solar panels.  But, I assume you are only wanting a portable solar power source for emergencies.  If so, I think this cheaper S-1116 is your best choice. It might also be a good choice considering that they do last five years - and the scientific community is continuously improving, and reducing cost of, everything electronic.  All four of my panels tested better than advertised.  Maybe I should have given the S-1116 five stars.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own four of these.  Got them from another source.  I have all of them in a closet waiting for an extended power outage.  I purchased Radio Shack #274-1573 adapters so that I can plug them directly into my four Xantrex XPower Powerpack 400 plus units (battery pack power sources).  These power packs give me both 12 Volt DC and 115 Volt AC.  I keep them fully charged by plugging them in to the wall socket.  As for choosing solar panels, If I could afford it (and I was many years younger) I might have purchased the much more expensive monocrystalline solar panels.  They retain 80% of original efficiency after twenty five years of continuous use.  By contrast, these much cheaper S-1116 briefcase panels will only last about five years of continuous use.  Also, the monocrystalline panels are much more efficient and thus smaller while producing higher wattage.  A nice portable monocrystalline briefcase is available at much higher cost.  It is even somewhat weather proof.  The S-1116 is not weather proof.  If you want to set up a lifetime solar power source, buy monocrystalline solar panels.  But, I assume you are only wanting a portable solar power source for emergencies.  If so, I think this cheaper S-1116 is your best choice. It might also be a good choice considering that they do last five years &#8211; and the scientific community is continuously improving, and reducing cost of, everything electronic.  All four of my panels tested better than advertised.  Maybe I should have given the S-1116 five stars.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Zuteck</title>
		<link>http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Zuteck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.titrain.com/s-1116-12v-briefcase-solar-generator/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>   I bought this unit as a low cost way to gain some hands on experience with solar panels, and for possible use to recharge my laptop computer after a hurricane power outage.  Via digital voltmeter I found:
&lt;br /&gt;Open circuit voltage: ~ 21.5 v
&lt;br /&gt;Max charging current:   400 - 500 ma
&lt;br /&gt;   Both the voltage and current will vary somewhat depending on temperature and insolation - these values are for shirt sleeve temperature and good sky conditions.  I&#039;ve used it to recharge the battery on a motorcycle that&#039;s used infrequently, and leave it on the front dash of an Astro van that is also infrequently used.  It adds charge in both cases, but at a half amp tops its not a fast way to do it.
&lt;br /&gt;   The unit is reasonably well built, and the supplied hookup cables are useful.  For light duty or maintenance charging, it can do the job.  If you want to deliver a more robust amount of power, a monocrystaline panel will deliver a lot more juice for the same physical size, whether its briefcase or regular panel.
&lt;br /&gt;   Bottom line - if you understand its limits, this product is a good way to mess around with solar power at a modest price.  But it you want to generate more serious levels of power, look at the mono or poly crystaline alternatives.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this unit as a low cost way to gain some hands on experience with solar panels, and for possible use to recharge my laptop computer after a hurricane power outage.  Via digital voltmeter I found:<br />
<br />Open circuit voltage: ~ 21.5 v<br />
<br />Max charging current:   400 &#8211; 500 ma<br />
<br />   Both the voltage and current will vary somewhat depending on temperature and insolation &#8211; these values are for shirt sleeve temperature and good sky conditions.  I&#8217;ve used it to recharge the battery on a motorcycle that&#8217;s used infrequently, and leave it on the front dash of an Astro van that is also infrequently used.  It adds charge in both cases, but at a half amp tops its not a fast way to do it.<br />
<br />   The unit is reasonably well built, and the supplied hookup cables are useful.  For light duty or maintenance charging, it can do the job.  If you want to deliver a more robust amount of power, a monocrystaline panel will deliver a lot more juice for the same physical size, whether its briefcase or regular panel.<br />
<br />   Bottom line &#8211; if you understand its limits, this product is a good way to mess around with solar power at a modest price.  But it you want to generate more serious levels of power, look at the mono or poly crystaline alternatives.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

